week 9:

Week Nine was wiki week.  the readings exposed me to many things, including wikimatrix, a great tool to discern which wiki creator is best suited to your needs.  I have to admit that my knowledge of wikis is very limited.  Before creating the wiki for this class, the only exposure I had to editing or creating wikis was adding a comma to a Wikipedia article.
  I still have reservations about using wikis, mostly due to my own ignorance.  Although there are some limitations to wikis in general.  I assume that the choice of wetpaint for the class wiki was due to it being free and having some good features.  However, I noticed when editing the wiki that simulataneous editing wasn't possible.
   I know that I won't feel comfortable until I have further experience with wikis.  To get this experience, i plan to create a wiki for my extended family's Adirondack vacation, with discussion forums and news pages.  Hopefully it will free us of the horrible email listserve that we currently employ.

week eight

This week was all about choosing appropriate technological tools for classroom instruction.  The readings focused on giving specific tools and technologies for specific lessons.  I learned about how using technology needs to be balanced with the appropriate pedagogical approach.  Also, the teacher, and how they teach, needs to be considered when planning a lesson to collaborate on.

 I learned about wikis, mostly firsthand.  Our assignment required us to create a wiki page and use Google Docs to share our thoughts about websites.  Our group had some struggles that I really take away as learning experiences.

 When collaborating online, communication is key.  Also imperative is having distinct duties for each group member.  When I collaborate online again, I will seek to make a single group member the communications hub, so all ideas and decisions flow through one person.  I think the material being studied and analyzed for this week's assignment wasn't the real lesson.  I think how we organized, communicated and treated each other was the true lesson.   I look forward to creating similar lessons, where students need to create order from chaos.  I will find it interesting to see which students take leadership roles, which students communicate well, and which students are flexible and able to focus on the task at hand.

Week 7:

This week I learned a lot about C3 issues.  From the video and readings, I took away a greater appreciation for the complexity of the issue.  On one hand we have parents, schools, and society at large trying to prevent exposure of young people to bullying and the dangers of the internet.  On the other hand, we have young people, supercharged geniuses, trying to find themselves, often trying to find what we educators and parents are trying to hide them from.
  I learned about some research that highlighted how most teens are actually savvy enough to not respond to typical online predator situations.  I learned about policies that seek to continue teaching social norms and hope that teens can then "behave" online.  I now have great resouce, onguardonline.gov, that will provide me with some structure when I teach online safety to my students.  Also, the AASL page on anti-bullying resources will come in handy as well.

All of this information is starting to really add up.  I'm thinking about changing the format of this blog, and using it more as a storage point for all the links, for I suppose the wetpaint will eventually go away.  Or does it stick around?  Hmmm...

Week 6

This week the readings focused on library web design, with a focus on accessibility.

  I learned a lot about the use of images on websites and how they can be a hindrance to accessibility.  I have used images, and continue to use images to convey information online.  I never considered how this limits access by people with visual impairments.  I can't help but disagree with a few points made, such as the inability to zoom in on an image with a web browser.  A simple ctrl+ will do the trick.
  The Berger article on social tagging was of great interest to me.  I like how it pointed out that Pennsylvania's library system has already implemented tagging in their library catalog.  I feel that if library's don't embrace tagging, it will be the death blow to their already struggling OPACS.  I already use library thing for associated content (because of user tags) and Amazon for reviews (because of both professional and user-reviews)  The library catalog is where I go after I have already done all my research.
  I felt the article kinda glossed over some of the potentials of tagging.  I see tagging as something I would like to automate.  So, when a lauded Harvard professor does his reading on a subject of interest, his reading is automatically tracked (with his consent, of course)  Imagine the abilities.  A professor, (such as yourself) could check to see what exactly a student had read before a paper was written.

On that note, are you able to track the times when people click on the links in our Wetpaint group?  Ever thought of comparing the times that readings were clicked, compared to when we are making our Forum posts?  


 

Week 5

Reading One, Berger:

   Starts with the ancient history of where search comes from.  Middle contains search engines that are alternatives to  Google.  Ask, Clusty and KidsQuintra are mentioned.  Interesting Note:  Google didn't give me the Quintura site when I misspelled as Quintora.  This is most obviously intentional, given my intimate knowledge of how accurate their spelling algorithms are.  Relevant, don't you think?  Guess those lawsuits from other search engines across the pond haven't scared them too much.  Bonus Resource:  I noticed searchengineland in the footnotes, and got myself re-acquainted with a blog that can keep me current.

#2, http://21cif.com/tools/
Oh wow!  I love the search wizard!   What a great resource to return to!  This Bonus Resource:  I like the website evaluators, the circle kits, I need to come back to this resource.

#,  The Google Game:
   This is a great concept.  I love how these readings introduce me to ideas, which I can then search for, to find more uses and applications.  I now have a lesson for Monday morning!  Interesting Note:  The article states that asking Google a question isn't an ideal search.  While this is true, the proliferation of question and answer sites, along with many people not listening to that advice, causes algorithms to respond accordingly.

#3, The Return of the Google game
   Ok, now I have a lot of questions to use, because like the article said, teachers need to do some work to come up with good search ideas.  I think the article overly simplifies the relationship between number of results and quality of results, but I'll let is slide.

#4,  Google in the classroom:
   This article gave me good reason to be happy.  I'm already familiar with many of the methods mentioned.  However, I like how the example projects pull from so many of Google's offerings, and how that shows student't to be multifaceted in their information gatherings.  Bonus Resource http://www.google.com/educators/tools.html

#5.  Google Squared:
    Unless I'm missing something, this has been removed from Google Labs...

#6, Seven Search Engines for Kids:
    Kidrex and Wolphram Alpha for educators were my two favorites.  I look forward to checking them out in more depth.

Week 4:

The first reading, "Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project" contained a lot of seemingly obvious things, like explaining how teens communicate, to surprising insight.  The insights I found interesting centered on how teens have such ever-present communication with each other.  The article talked about the many ways teens achieve these multiple presences, both online and off.  It talked about the work-arounds teens employ to maintain these networks.  This got me thinking about the potential of these latent networks, of how much that could be achieved if just some of this potential was harnessed.
  The interview with Lawrence Lessig was also interesting.  I have to admit I'm still confused about fair use and copyright law.  This confusion is something that troubles me.  I know that as an aspiring information professional, I need to address this deficiency.  It concerns me that Lessig was talking about how fair use in theory is more supported than it is in practice.  That makes me think even our courts are confused on this matter.
  The comic about fair use both frightened and enlightened me to just how complex this matter is.  The example of documentary use of music is crazy.  I never thought about how copyrighted our culture is.  Then I checked out the fair use evaluator tool, and I think that might help my confusion, however, it seemed Lessig was saying that fair use is not always applicable in the court of law.


I have far more work ahead of me...


P.S.  I really like the split up discussion threads.  I'm not gonna lie, I didn't listen to last weeks' podcast.  I thought I could do the readings and posts and that the podcast would just further explain stuff for people that need explaining.  I now see the error of my ways.  I will be listening now.

Information Science

I would like to write about both our science and our profession.  Many feel that our occupation needs to be one or the other; a science or a profession.  Yet I think we are both.  We used to be far more of a profession, but this weeks reading, “Information Behavior of the Researcher of the Future," proves how much scientific methods have been incorporated into our work.
   I can't tell you how much I appreciated seeing a scientific analysis that clearly stated how library patrons don't like the hierarchical organization that our profession has relied on since it began.  Of course, organization is necessary to some extent, but users are not librarians, and they increasingly favor access methods that they define, and that adapt to them.


  Users want information as easily as possible.  It is not our place to define acceptable information-seeking behavior.  It is our job to supplement and assist.


  Every time a librarian buries access to a material in a menu (with no search access or other means of access) they are severely limiting the material's exposure.  They are doing their library and patrons a disservice.  


  I feel that it is my job to tear down hierarchical organization systems.  I feel very strongly on this matter.  It just may be what I was put on this earth to do.  


Look out Dewey Decimal, I'm gunning for you!